Talk:Economy of communist Czechoslovakia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


well, it's always good to have this kind of knowledge at our fingertips.

The article contains numerous unsupported, partisan statements. For example, what does it mean that the economic growth rate was "unsustainable"? That it would have continued to decline if history had turned out differently? How does one know? Is this an informed prediction of alternate future historical outcomes? Is it an analytic statement about specific structural issues? Which ones? Is it just a personal opinion of the cited source? Almost every sentence in the article has this problem--repeating oft-repeated phrases about Communist economy, without sufficient substantive content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 12:35, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

the ppp of soviet union i think isn't true. goto [[1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 龙之舞 (talkcontribs) 22:22, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Economy of communist Czechoslovakia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:10, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Nothing from '1960s' onwards is referenced. Where is this information from? (talk) 15:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]